当前位置:首页 > 环球新闻 > 中国时事

吴小平:你经协助老婆生完孩子可以离开人生舞台了

来源:新浪财经 俄罗斯中文网
字号 T|T|T
时间:2018-09-14

  近日非常震惊的看到吴小平的一篇文章:中国私营经济已完成协助公有经济发展的任务,应逐渐离场。

  

  第一个反应:这不就是diduan人口已经协助高端人口完成城市现代化任务应回到穷乡僻壤去待着的理论的2.0版?谁给他的权利把企业与人分成3、6、9等?谁给他的权利决定企业的生死?我可以说吴小平你已经协助老婆生完孩子你可以离开人生舞台了吗?

  实在荒谬之至!

  众所周知,企业也是法人,也有自己的法律地位,他的生死,在守法的前提下,能决定的只有自己与市场!即如果市场有需要、它们自己愿意做下去,其他任何人不具备将其处死的权利!

  如果国有企业没有民营企业的帮助就做不好,从逻辑上来讲,不是应当留下民营企业才对吗?因为民营企业在没有政策支持、很难获得银行贷款以及各类高大上人才的情况下,简言之,在获得很少公共资源的情况下,不但有能力让自己发展壮大,还能帮助国有企业发展,这样能干的企业不是更应当留下来才能让国家的发展更经济吗?

  更何况,没有民营经济的经济,我们建国以来已经搞了几十年了,最后,党中央给出的结论是:国民经济到了崩溃的边缘!前苏联也一样,虽然成长为军事强国,但是经济上却极端虚弱,关于前苏联商店里的货架,我们从小就知道基本上是空空荡荡的。而最近的例子就是委内瑞拉,从查韦斯开始,把所有的企业都收归国有,结果怎么样?委内瑞拉在短短20年的时间里,就从南美最富裕的国家之一,粮食出口的国家,变成一个人人身家过亿,却根本买不到食物的国家!

  如果这样,我们这个有十几亿张嘴每天要吃饭的国家,会不会再来一次困难时期呢?高善文说他可以洗洗睡了,安度晚年,恐怕也就是一个梦吧?

  邓小平同志倡导的改革开放以及90年代初的南巡讲话,让中国的民营经济有了一个蓬勃的发展,才有了今天我们中国如此巨大的经济建设成就!如果不是让乡镇企业发展、不是在农村实行家庭承包制,我们现在十几亿人的穿衣吃饭恐怕还是要计划经济:使用布票、粮票才能保证有限的供应吧?如果不是让阿里、腾讯以及华为这些民营企业一心追赶世界最新的互联网技术,中国的产品能够以更低的成本走向世界、中国的企业产品能够更快、更方便 的实现销售,中国的沟通成本的大幅下降以及沟通效率的大幅提高,我们是不可能在如此短暂的时间里实现现代化的。

  如果不是有了民航的改革开放,引进民营航空,估计我们到现在,坐个飞机都要去开个县团级以上的证明才能有机会去航空公司少得可怜的网点去排长队买机票吧?

  想当年,全市场中只有电信一家通讯公司的时候,家里装个电话,非要我们买TCL的产品,如果不买,好啊,那就别装电话了!

  更不要说住房了。

  如果没有恒大、绿城以及很多小得不入眼的民营企业的房地产开发商,不怕困难,哪怕盖一个房子要盖上百个章,跑遍所有的机构部门去烧香拜码头,为我们盖起一座座漂亮的大楼,我们的居住条件不可能在20年里发生如此天翻地覆的变化!

  我们的父辈,在国企工作了一辈子,作为高知,最后能分到一套50平米的房子就感觉好得不得了了。2000年,我写了一篇批评广船国际这家国企公司的文章,它们公司把上亿元的现金存入一家信托,最后变成了一笔坏账,颗粒无收。这篇文章引发了广船员工极大的反响。当时有广船的员工专门跑到报社来找我,气愤不已:作为为广船工作了20多年的工程师,一家7口人只能住十几平方的小房子。他心痛:原来广船这么有钱,这些钱为什么存到信托机构去,也不盖房子给员工住?因为广船住房条件差的并不是他一个人!

  衣食住行,能让我们满意的服务,回想起来,基本上全是民营企业提供的。大家都说食在广州,我曾经试过,从早上3、4点钟起来,就看到有人在路边店吃东西,这些不辞辛苦的小店主,都是民营企业家,半夜里,市民们坐在珠江边上,喝啤酒、吹江风、侃大山,这样幸福快乐的生活,几乎全是民营经济提供的。

  民营企业是鲶鱼,没有了鲶鱼,鱼群只会死得更快!

  吴小平,你是要把中国变成无小平吗?

  双语阅读~

  Wu Xiaoping: You have helped your wife to leave

  the stage of life after giving birth to a child!

  Today I was shocked to see an article by Wu Xiaoping: China’s private economy has completed its task of assisting the development of the public economy and should gradually leave the scene.

  

  The first reaction: Isn't this the 2.0 version of the theory that the low-end population has helped the high-end population to complete the urban modernization task and should return to the backcountry? Who gave him the right to divide the company and people into 3, 6, and so on? Who gives him the right to decide the life and death of the company? I can say that Wu Xiaoping, you have assisted your wife to give birth to a child, can you leave the stage of life?

  It’s ridiculous!

  As everyone knows, a company is also a legal person, and it also has its own legal status. His life and death, under the premise of obeying the law, can only decide himself and the market! That is, if the market needs it and they are willing to do it themselves, no one else has the right to execute it!

  If state-owned enterprises do not do well without the help of private enterprises, logically speaking, shouldn't it be left to private enterprises? Because private enterprises have no policy support, it is difficult to obtain bank loans, and all kinds of high-level talents, in short, with few public resources, not only have the ability to grow and develop, but also help state-owned enterprises. Development, isn't this capable company more likely to stay in order to make the country's development more economical?

  What's more, without the economy of the private economy, we have been engaged in the country for decades. Finally, the Party Central Committee has concluded that the national economy is on the verge of collapse! The same is true of the former Soviet Union. Although it has grown into a military power, it is extremely weak in the economy. As for the shelves of the former Soviet stores, we have known from an early age that it is basically empty. The most recent example is Venezuela. Starting from Chavez, all companies are nationalized. What is the result? In just 20 years, Venezuela has turned from a country with one of the richest countries in South America, a country that exports food, to a country with hundreds of millions of people but no food at all.

  If so, will we have a hard time in a country with more than one billion people who have to eat every day? Gao Shanwen said that he can wash and sleep, and he will be a dream in peace.

  The reform and opening up advocated by Comrade Deng Xiaoping and the southern tour speech in the early 1990s have given China's private economy a vigorous development, and today we have such a huge economic construction achievement in China! If it is not for the development of township enterprises, nor for the implementation of household contracting system in rural areas, we now have to plan for the economy of dressing for more than one billion people: can we guarantee the limited supply by using cloth tickets and food stamps? If it is not for private enterprises such as Ali, Tencent and Huawei to catch up with the latest Internet technologies in the world, Chinese products can go to the world at a lower cost, and Chinese enterprises can achieve faster and more convenient sales. China's communication costs With a sharp drop and a significant increase in communication efficiency, it is impossible for us to achieve modernization in such a short period of time.

  If it is not the reform and opening up of civil aviation, the introduction of private aviation, it is estimated that we have to go to a county level or above to get a plane to get the opportunity to go to the airlines to get a long queue to buy tickets ?

  I thought that when there was only one telecom company in the whole market, I had a phone at home. We had to buy TCL products. If you don’t buy it, then don’t install the phone!

  Not to mention housing.

  If there are no real estate developers in Evergrande, Greentown and many small private enterprises, they are not afraid of difficulties. Even if they build a house with hundreds of chapters, they will go through all the institutional departments to burn the worship of the pier and build a house for us. A beautiful building, our living conditions cannot be changed so much in 20 years!

  Our fathers, who have worked in state-owned enterprises for a lifetime, as a Kochi, can finally get a 50-square-meter house and feel very good. In 2000, I wrote an article criticizing the state-owned enterprise of GSI, which deposited hundreds of millions of dollars in a trust and eventually turned into a bad debt. This article triggered a great response from the staff of the ship. At that time, the employees of Guangchuan went to the newspaper to come to me, and they were angry. As an engineer who worked for Guangzhou Ship for more than 20 years, a family of seven people can only live in a small house of more than ten square meters. His heartache: It turns out that the ship is so rich, why did the money go to the trust institution, and does not build a house for the staff to live? Because the conditions of the wide ship housing are not his own!

  The food, clothing, housing and transportation services that can satisfy us are, in retrospect, basically provided by private enterprises. Everyone said that eating in Guangzhou, I have tried, from 3 or 4 o'clock in the morning, I saw someone eating at the roadside shop, these hard-working small shop owners are private entrepreneurs, in the middle of the night, the citizens Sitting on the edge of the Pearl River, drinking beer, blowing the river, and mountain, so happy and happy life, almost all provided by the private economy.

  Private enterprises are squid, without squid, the fish will only die faster!

  Wu Xiaoping, are you going to turn China into no peace?

俄罗斯中文网版权及免责声明:

    1、凡注明“来源:俄罗斯中文网的资讯,版权均属于俄罗斯中文网,转载请注明“来源:俄罗斯中文网”。

    2、凡本网未注明“来源:俄罗斯中文网” 的所有资讯,均转载自其它媒体,转载目的在于传递更多信息,服务大众,并不代表俄罗斯中文网赞同其观点和对其真实性负责,也不构成任何投资或其他建议。

    3、俄罗斯中文网(eluosi.cn)部分内容经社区和论坛转载,原作者未知,如因作品内容、图片以及其它可能涉及版权的问题需本站删除或者更新作者的,请及时与我们联系,我们将在第一时间处理。

    ※ 有关作品版权事宜请发送邮件到admin#eluosi.cn(@)